Hi all,
While taking apart my top end on a cb125k4 ( twin ) i measured the end gap of the piston rings. They were 1.3 mm which is almost double of the max service limit. When inserting new piston rings the end gap was still 0.9 mm which baffled me . So i measured both cilinder bores and it was bored out to the first oversize ( +0.25 ) pistons and rings that were used were standard size.
I am currently looking for new +0.25 pistons and rings which are really expensive and not easy to find anymore.
My question : what happens if i would use +0.25 rings on the standard size pistons in this engine? The end gap would at least be in spec. I guess there would be (more) piston slap ? As the engine did "run" with standard size rings and pistons and did not blow up. Except for faster wear would this be somewhat "safe / ok" to run it that way? How bad / dangerous would this be?
While taking apart my top end on a cb125k4 ( twin ) i measured the end gap of the piston rings. They were 1.3 mm which is almost double of the max service limit. When inserting new piston rings the end gap was still 0.9 mm which baffled me . So i measured both cilinder bores and it was bored out to the first oversize ( +0.25 ) pistons and rings that were used were standard size.
I am currently looking for new +0.25 pistons and rings which are really expensive and not easy to find anymore.
My question : what happens if i would use +0.25 rings on the standard size pistons in this engine? The end gap would at least be in spec. I guess there would be (more) piston slap ? As the engine did "run" with standard size rings and pistons and did not blow up. Except for faster wear would this be somewhat "safe / ok" to run it that way? How bad / dangerous would this be?