Tell us your favorite kind of engine + your favorite bike.

CB450DX

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2024
Total Posts
170
Total likes
222
Location
Curitiba, Brazil
Title says it all, I'm very curious. Tell me! Make the case for your engine/bike.

I'm on the hunt for my first "modern" bike (mainly looking for ABS, great suspension/frame and great engine) and I want to know what kind of engines/engine feel you like and what made you choose X bike for your favorite (and does it have the favorite engine or not?)

Having ridden some more bikes recently while trying to pick one, I've become more aware than ever about how absurdly diffrent engines can feel.

I've ridden quite a bit more my brother's Daytona 675r. The superbike pulls are incredible, and the engine is amazing and high revving as well, but despite how premium everything else is, I'm just not a racing ergonomics kinda guy. Its analog RPM tach is awfully sexy though. if only the speed triples didn't have that awful mosquito headlight.
Rode the modern CB500F (now Hornet 500) which felt pretty similar in power delivery to my CB but just way more refined (with an "eh" stock exhaust note) and quick.
Rode a Z400 twin on a parking lot, and then changed bikes for a Z900 - which I hated the looks but d*mn that bike felt great. MT-07 also felt amazingly flickable and quick although that one I rode far less.

I recently rode a 2019 Triumph T100 (900cc twin, high torque engine) and even if the ergonomics and everything else were pretty much what I'm used to, the engine was just completely different from what I'm used to, much more than the last ones.

Of course, double the torque I'm used to, but also at half the rpms, I'm also pretty sure I was the first person to ever rev her above 5k rpms - Don't really enjoy the 270 twin sound, but the stock exhausts for this bike are LOUD, which kinda makes it sound good.

And at first I thought I just didn't like it, which never happened before as I'm very open minded when it comes to 2 wheels, but after a few more minutes riding, I started understanding how you're supposed to treat her, the bike is VERY punchy and despite the simple suspension, felt very premium. The one I rode was a 2019 black edition model with 12000 kilometers on it so it was pretty much new as well. I later serviced the bike after the ride, cleaning the air filter and inspecting and cleaning everything below the seat/side panels. It's pretty much a japanese bike under the seat, Keihin everywhere.

I kinda missed how linear and how "elastic" my 450 engine is (although on that side, I guess gearing also comes up on the equation), even if it is much less punchier. I missed hearing the RPM climb and the power coming linearly from 4000 to ~6500rpm and then keeping up.
My petrolhead car friends literally went "that's such a honda/vtec thing to say" when I talked to them about it and I guess I maybe am a 4 cylinder kind of guy.

I'll test ride a NC750X this week which should be pretty close to the Triumph (the NC redlines at 6000, its pretty much half of a Honda Fit engine as far as I understand). But then I saw a CB1000R at the last bike meeting I went to.

And man... You might not like how it looks, I myself feel like it's a weird bike that doesn't look too modern or too retro, creating kind of a weird middle ground. But in real person that red tank just screamed at me.

So I decided to raise my budget.
And test ride both the CB650R and the CB1000R. I'm going for the old models with the non-tft dash (and on the CB650R, the older models have the bronze engine covers, newer ones are all black).
1784604686834.png
I figure I'm probably going to get one of them at the end of the day. The 1000R is a little bit outside of my range, but it isn't a huge bump over the 650R prices... It's less than 10%, so I might go for it to try avoiding buying a bigger bike down the line (when bikes are inevitably even more expensive).

I wish I could also test ride the Hornet 750 but contrary to the rest of the world, Hondas are the most expensive brand around here, and they're also out of stock/waiting list everywhere (and to be fair, so is the new cb650r with the e-clutch, but I'll test ride a 2021 one, same for the CB1000R, it's the old one with the simpler non-tft panel).
The GSX-8S is probably the best bang for the buck over here as its pretty much costs the same price new as a lightly used CB650R, but Suzuki's parts availability is far from great, and despite it having some great things like removable subframe and oil pan design... I expect the GSX-8S to be similar to the MT07 where I feel like its amazing but there's no "falling in love".

I used to judge people who picked their bikes by appearance, and now I'm over here thinking of doing the same.

I of course also thought about older bikes like the fuel injected + ABS Bandit 650/1250s and also of the older modern CB1000R (that had an hydraulic clutch and ABS), but although I share my country of origin with Ayrton Senna, the similiraties end there, I'm not as good as he was in the rain, I'm usually forced to ride on it and although I take pride in not having to lay'erdown yet, I have gone through a couple of scares over the last couple of weeks and have felt like I was "riding a cloud" way too many times, and after testing bikes with premium suspension... I might just be spoiled too. At this point, a rain mode would kind of be welcome, at least traction control.

I still refuse to simply buy a car, though.
 
It's kind of weird to me that when I started posting on here, I barely had any riding experience (although by all accounts a decent amount of wrenching experience) and now I'm over here 2 years later talking about engines while thinking about frame rigidity, suspension quality and blablabla.

Time really does fly when you're having fun.

Oh yeah, and I'm not selling the CB 450 by the way. I'm trying to be her last owner, when I pass, my nieces can have it, I'd even be happy if they trash it, as long as they do it riding.

And before @ancientdad comes here and posts absolutely beautiful pictures of the CBX1000/1050: CBX'S DON'T COUNT.
 
Why stop at a photo of a CBX, when you can still get one?


IMG_0566.jpeg

On the topic, it really depends on what the ride purpose is, but I’ve found that the 400-500cc mark is a pretty decent sweet spot, on newer bikes the CB500X is pretty nice. I’m not a big fan of very upright seating, makes me feel top heavy and I end up understeering.

Heavy highway I prefer something 750+
 
Why stop at a photo of a CBX, when you can still get one?
Having owned 2 CBXs (1047), my preference for one would be the '79 or '80 models, never could get into the sport touring version. Don't like riding behind a fairing and I gave up on bags back when I still had my CA72 about 56 years ago. But IF I could afford one now, it would have to be in running/riding condition as I'm not interested in doing a second CBX engine rebuild, one was enough thanks. :giggle: But I guess if you wanted into at least some version of a CBX, that's about as inexpensively as you could expect to do it.

I loved both of my naked Gold Wings too, but the earlier transmissions weren't durable enough for me to pound on like I always have pretty much any bike I've owned. After 3 transmission repairs between a '75 and a '76, which on those engines is practically a complete overhaul (since the only thing not disturbed when you go into the bottom end is the right side head and pistons), yet another engine I have no further desire to go into.
 
My personal preference is a traditional cruiser, more upright position provides more comfort and less fatigue. Parallel twin engine of course, type I for the unique exhaust notes from the 180 crank. Descendants of the old 2 cylinder John Deere tractors I grew up on although they red lined around 1100 rpm.

In my perfect world Honda might have replaced the DOHC 450 with a DOHC 750.
 
In my perfect world Honda might have replaced the DOHC 450 with a DOHC 750.
Though the vibes would be significant if they'd simply enlarged that engine, I'd always thought that it would have been cool for Honda to increase its size too, even a DOHC 650 twin would have been interesting. But oversquare to stay with Honda's longstanding belief in short stroke, high rpm engines that make more horsepower than torque. Something like 85mm bore with the 450's 57.8mm stroke.
 
Fuel injected I4 bikes with a semi upright position. Things like my FJR1300 and previous Gen 1 FZ1's. Close second is a decent I3 like my Speed triple.
 
I will always have a soft spot for my very 1st bike.
Yamaha LT2 100 Enduro
I was 13, had 80 acres of woods, trails, a gravel pit... the riding skills learned (often the hard way), the sense of freedom, the maintenance, the friends made... that bike will always be my favorite.
 
I've owned just a few bikes:
2014 Triumph Speedmaster (back when they were more of a cruiser than what they are today)
2016 Triumph Bonneville T120
2016 Harley-Davidson Sportster Roadster
1978 Honda CB400T II

I have taken quite a few different test rides on various bikes however... and two stand out the most to me. The BMW R Nine T, and the Indian FTR. I wouldn't hesitate to buy either of those today if I could. Previously I didn't want to risk being locked to BMW for some of the maintenance, and at the time the FTR was first released it had some issues that required remapping the bike to run properly in the cold, and it would have been my only form of transportation at that time, so I stuck with the Bonneville. I loved all my bikes, all twin cylinders, but the Kawasaki Z900 RS and the Yamaha XSR were pretty fun rides as well, and make me dream about a nice triple every so often.

Through all my rides and the test rides, I think I prefer a more upright riding position for sure, maybe slightly sporty. The cruiser feel wasn't my favorite. Maybe if I were doing longer hauls, and had a back rest on them, I would appreciate it more. But for now I like being more upright, not so leaned back. I think the Sportster Roadster (with its lower than usual handlebars) was the perfect riding position setup.
 
Why stop at a photo of a CBX, when you can still get one?
Those graphics look so sexy. What a beautiful bike.

Around here it became, tied with the 80's CBX750F the number 1 most sought-after bikes for collections which in turn made its price go over the clouds. A decent CBX1050 or even a Benelli Sei go for over R$120.000,00, I've seen some sell for over R$170.000,00, which would be somethjing like $25000 for the 120k and $33.000,00 for the 170k.
KZ1300s, which are much more exclusive and for which parts are pretty much made up of "unobtainium" go for something close to $25k as well.

Which, by the way, is the price of a brand new, top of the line, race ready, 190kph in 1st gear, CBR1000RR-R. Both here in Brazil and in the USA (where it goes for $28k).

The same thing ruined 2 stroke bikes as well. RD135's and RD350's are stupidly expensive at the moment. RZ500/RD500 V4 is the same, but at least those cost more than they should everywhere.
 
Last edited:
I'm not interested in doing a second CBX engine rebuild, one was enough thanks. :giggle:

I loved both of my naked Gold Wings too, but the earlier transmissions weren't durable enough for me to pound on like I always have pretty much any bike I've owned. After 3 transmission repairs between a '75 and a '76, which on those engines is practically a complete overhaul (since the only thing not disturbed when you go into the bottom end is the right side head and pistons), yet another engine I have no further desire to go into.
One of the brazilian mechanics I followed had a CBX come in. Engine had weird noises, upon removing the head, 5 moderately (but healthy looking) carbon'd up piston. One straight-up WHITE piston.
He almost cried as he was going along.

And I usually hear the Gold Wing people complain about wiring/electrics. Saw some nightmare-ish pics a couple days ago.
My personal preference is a traditional cruiser, more upright position provides more comfort and less fatigue. Parallel twin engine of course, type I for the unique exhaust notes from the 180 crank. Descendants of the old 2 cylinder John Deere tractors I grew up on although they red lined around 1100 rpm.

In my perfect world Honda might have replaced the DOHC 450 with a DOHC 750.
I guess the F800R would be the closest to a high spinning (up to 10k at least) dohc 750 we have at the moment. Although unfortunately it is a 360 crank.

I'll be the first to admit, I never liked the 180 crank stock exhaust sound. Probably due to the CB500F stock exhaust, but upon hearing one of those new Hornet 500s followed by a Kawasaki Z400, both with modified exhausts at a bike meet a few weeks ago, I kinda dig it.
Fuel injected I4 bikes with a semi upright position. Things like my FJR1300 and previous Gen 1 FZ1's. Close second is a decent I3 like my Speed triple.
So, big tourers! And two bikes I don't think we've ever got around here.
The closest I've ever seen to a gen 1 FZ1 would be a semi-faired Bandit 1200S/1250S
I will always have a soft spot for my very 1st bike.
Yamaha LT2 100 Enduro
I was 13, had 80 acres of woods, trails, a gravel pit... the riding skills learned (often the hard way), the sense of freedom, the maintenance, the friends made... that bike will always be my favorite.
I hear many similar stories about the DT180s and XL/XRs.
[...]
Loved all my bikes, all twin cylinders, but the Kawasaki Z900 RS and the Yamaha XSR were pretty fun rides as well, and make me dream about a nice triple every so often.

Through all my rides and the test rides, I think I prefer a more upright riding position for sure, maybe slightly sporty. The cruiser feel wasn't my favorite. Maybe if I were doing longer hauls, and had a back rest on them, I would appreciate it more. But for now I like being more upright, not so leaned back. I think the Sportster Roadster (with its lower than usual handlebars) was the perfect riding position setup.
My brother's Daytona has been a great teacher to me, and I stay away from street triples, especially the 675Rs because I'm afraid that I wouldn't be able to say no for the right price, even if I know how much these bikes cost to maintain. Those 675 triples are outright superbike engines.

I agree with the riding position. I do enjoy the cruiser, but I'm mostly a street rider, so those do not work for me. I will say the much lower insurance rates for cruisers make a good argument.
ok, since you asked, I'd have to say my favorite engines are the ground-shaking, eardrum-harmful Harley-Davidson 1200+cc engines.
My favorite bike is a '79-'82 Honda SuperSport
That's HUGE contrast between bike and engine. Interesting. I did read about some dudes in the USA that stick harley engines into CBs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom